Jablonski et al. 2006 –
by Rebecca K.
Jablonski, D.,
Roy, K., & Valentine, J. W. (2006). Out of the tropics: evolutionary
dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science, 314(5796), 102-106.
Paper Authors: David
Jablonski, Kaustuv Roy, James W. Valentine
David Jablonski
· Ph.D. from Yale University
· Distinguished Service Professor at
University of Chicago
“My research emphasizes the combining of data from living and
fossil organisms to study the origins and the fates of lineages and
adaptations.”
Kaustuv Roy
· Ph.D. from University of Chicago
· Professor at University of California,
San Diego
“What are the
physical and biotic processes that determine large scale spatial patterns of
biodiversity? How do species and communities respond to climate change and
other anthropogenic impacts and what are the ecological and evolutionary
consequences of such responses? These and related questions form the focus of
my research.”
Earl D. McCoy
· Ph.D.
from University of California, Los Angeles
· Professor Emeritus at University of California,
Berkeley
“My
students and I study a broad range of ecological and biogeographical problems.
Many of our projects relate in some way to conservation biology, either in
theory or in practice. Most of our current research deals with conservation and
restoration of severely threatened upland habitats, particularly sandhill and
scrub, in Florida. Within this framework, my students have focused their
projects on a variety of topics: structure of gopher tortoise populations,
demography and autecology of sand skinks, restoration of Florida mouse
populations on lands mined for phosphate, and comparative biology of common and
rare frogs, for example. Other students have focused their projects on topics
such as methods of ecological analysis and the composition of species'
assemblages. My own research encompasses additional topics in the areas of
disturbance ecology, particularly fire ecology; biogeographical theory; and the
philosophical basis of ecology.
Virtually all of the research being conducted by my students is
aimed at solving particular problems and, therefore, probably would be labeled
"applied research" by many persons.”
Paper Summary:
The latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) is a large-scale pattern
that has been observed in a many taxonomic groups, with higher species
diversity occurring in the lower latitudes compared to the extratropics and further
away from the tropics. In this paper, Jablonski et al. 2016 evaluate the paradigm of the tropics as a cradle/museum
of biodiversity and “evaluate the spatial and temporal dynamics that underlie
present-day LDG” while looking at previous work from the perspective of their
presented framework.
“From
an evolutionary perspective, large-scale spatial patterns of biodiversity
depend on three variables: origination rates (O), extinction rates (E), and
changes in geographic distributions (expressed here as I, for immigration into
a latitudinal bin) of taxa.”
The authors discuss these variables and the models that use them,
highlighting assumptions and problems that might arise in the way that these
variables are treated when trying to answer certain questions. Some examples
that were mentioned:
-
Looking at net diversifications rates
might be useful for answering many important questions, but in looking at the
cradle/museum question, looking at the rates may be limited by the combinations
of O and E – a place with higher O may have a higher E as well, and in rates
this overall net value might be low and this can be misinterpreted.
-
It might be implicitly assumed that
LDG derives largely from differences in in situ origination and extinction, but
this might be an oversimplification. E.g. are taxa shifts being accounted for?
(Taxa shift in response to variables such as climate changes, etc.)
Out of the Tropics
“We suggest that the available data are most consistent with an
‘‘out of the tropics’’ (OTT) model, in which the tropics are both a cradle and
a museum, with taxa preferentially originating in the tropics and expanding
over time into high latitudes without losing their initial tropical
distributions.”
Using data on marine Bivalvia, the authors tested their hypothesis
and found that:
-
(Extinction) Higher extinction rates
in higher latitudes over the past 11 million years compared to the tropics.
“Taken at face
value, the bivalve data show substantially higher extinctions at high latitudes
over the past 11 million years; only 30 exclusively tropical genera go extinct
as compared to 107 extratropical and cosmopolitan ones.” However, the authors
suggest caution here – this result may be owed to the severe under sampling in
the tropics… “but the presence of so many last occurrences at high latitudes
constrains potential patterns and suggests that tropical extinction rates are
unlikely to be substantially higher than extratropical ones.”
-
(Origination) More first occurrences
in the tropics compared to extratropics (117 vs. 46)
“Restricting
analyses to families having ≥75%
of their genera known as fossils, tropical first occurrences of those bivalve
taxa significantly exceed extratropical ones in each of three successive
geologic time intervals leading up to the present day (late Miocene, Pliocene,
and Pleistocene)” (this may also be a lower estimate: “because sampling is
strongly biased in the opposite direction (so that some genera originating in
the tropics will not be recorded paleontologically until they expand into the
better sampled extratropical zones)”)
-
(Immigration) More than 75% of the
taxa in the data occur first in the tropics, but now they also occur
extratropically today. “The bivalve data indicate that genera originating in
the tropics tend to extend their ranges to higher latitudes over time…”
I'm a bit confused about the rationale for the out of the tropics model. How can a few handfuls of biomes be the source of evolutionary change?
ReplyDeleteMy takeaway from this paper is that for a long time, the "tropics as a cradle or a museum" or latitudinal diversity gradients (LDG), has been a widely accepted evolutionary model. However, the author's goals were to demonstrate the ways in which this hypothesis falls short. Assuming they succeeded in doing so, is the LDG model now considered more or less obsolete?
ReplyDelete