West et al. 1997 Paper
A
General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology
Paper Authors: Geoffrey B.
West, James H. Brown,* Brian J. Enquist
Geoffrey
B. West
·
Theoretical Physicist
·
Distinguished Professor of the Santa Fe Institute
·
Bachelor of Arts, Cambridge
University, 1961
·
Ph.D., Stanford University, 1966
Research
Interests:
“Geoffrey West is a theoretical physicist
whose primary interests have been in fundamental questions in physics,
especially those concerning the elementary particles, their interactions and
cosmological implications”.
James
H. Brown
·
Professor of Biology at the University of New Mexico
·
Bachelor of Arts, Zoology, 1963, Cornell University
·
Ph.D., Zoology, 1967, University of Michigan
Research
Interests:
“Community
ecology and biogeography, with special projects on granivory in desert
ecosystems; biogeography of insular habitats; and structure of dynamics of
geographic-scale assemblages of many species”.
Brian J. Enquist
·
Professor
– Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona
· External Professor at the Santa Fe Institute
·
Ph.D. Biology, 1998,
University of New Mexico.
·
M.S. Biology, 1994.
University of New Mexico,
·
B.A. Biology (With
Distinction), 1991. The Colorado College
Research Interests:
“Macroecology, Global Ecology, Comparative Biology, Ecophysiology and
Functional Ecology”. “My collaborative
lab group strives to develop a more integrative, quantitative, and predictive
framework for biology, community ecology, and large-scale ecology. In
particular, we aim to link biological measures across spatial and temporal
scales in ecology and evolution”.
Main
Points
Allometric scaling relations, including
quarter (3/4)-power scaling, refers to the characteristic shared by all
organism, and the way in which essential materials are transported through
“space-filled fractal networks of branching tubes” that run throughout the body. The model applies to systems with
tree-like structures with terminating ends and include such distribution
systems as, plant vascular systems, animal circulatory systems (this was the
data they used), and bronchial tubes in animal lungs.
The paper, which focuses on quarter-power
scaling for metabolism and body size in mammals and how these physiological
patterns tend to be even multiples of ¼, assumes surface area and volume of the
cardiovascular system directly correlate with body size. However, it isn’t entirely clear why
quarter-power scaling is exhibited by nearly all kinds of animals. This paper attempts to better understand
this, by proposing a common mechanism underlying these laws:
“Living
things are sustained by the transport of materials through
linear networks
that branch to supply all parts of the organism”.
Based
on this hypothesis, “a quantitative model that explains the origin and ubiquity
of quarter-power scaling” to “predict the essential features of transport
systems, such as mammalian blood vessels and bronchial trees, plant vascular
systems, and insect tracheal tubes”. It
was developed based on three assumptions:
1. A fractal-like
branching pattern that is space-filling is required.
2. “The final
branch of the network is a size-invariant unit” (i.e. the size (radii, length,
& other characteristics) of the minimal elements in the network are the
same for all organisms).
3. “The energy
required to distribute resources is minimized” (i.e. fluid resistance is
minimized due to the terminating structural nature of the network).
They
sought to demonstrate how the quarter-power scaling of metabolic rate, along
with other biological traits are the products of fractal-like resource
distribution system such as the cardiovascular system in mammals. By applying the assumption above, West
managed to realistically and quantitatively show how the model accurately
predicts scaling parameters and absolute values regarding serval traits of the
cardiovascular system in mammals.
Questions
1. Is the quarter-power
scaling law supported by allomatric data for classes other than mammals, such
as birds and/or reptiles?
2. Do other
types of scaling laws like the quarter-power scaling law exist? If so, how might they relate to macroecology?
You
may be interested in reading a critique published in 2004 by J. Kozlowski and
M. Konarzewski entitled “Is West, Brown and Enquist’s model of allometric
scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant?” In it, the authors criticize the model, deeming
it ‘mathematically incorrect’ and ‘biologically unjustified’. West et al, countered by publishing the paper
“Yes, West, Brown and Enquist’s model of allometric scaling is both
mathematically correct and biologically relevant”, in which they, again,
justify their findings as being biologically and mathematically sound.
I guess my main problem with this paper was that I wasn't able to see the bigger picture. I understood each equation, for the most part, individually, but not how they moved from one to another.
ReplyDeleteInteresting to think about about universal principles that might tie into metabolics! But like Tanner I'm also not so sure how this might tie into the overall conversation.
ReplyDelete