Holocene shifts in
the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts
Blog by Kate Lyons
Authors:
S. Kathleen Lyons, Kathryn L. Amatangelo, Anna K.
Behrensmeyer, Antoine Bercovici, Jessica L. Blois, Matt Davis, William A.
DiMichele, Andrew Du, Jussi T. Eronen, J. Tyler Faith, Gary R. Graves, Nathan Jud, Conrad Labandeira, Cindy V. Looy,
Brian McGill, Joshua H. Miller, David Patterson, Silvia Pineda-Munoz, Richard
Potts, Brett Riddle, Rebecca Terry, Anikó Tóth, Werner Ulrich, Amelia
Villaseñor, Scott Wing, Heidi Anderson, John Anderson, Donald Waller &
Nicholas J. Gotelli
This research demonstrates
that there has been a fundamental shift in community structure due to human
activity. We evaluated the co-occurrence structure of plant and mammal
communities using both fossil and modern datasets. The relative proportions of
significantly aggregated and segregated species pairs were stable for 300 million
years before abruptly changing approximately 6000 years ago. We tested this finding against several
possible biases and found that none of them could explain our data. The timing of the shift coincides with
increasing human impacts such as increasing population size and the spread of
agriculture. Our study thus indicates that the processes acting on ecological communities
today may be unique in the history of land ecosystems.
These results are important because of the intensifying debate about global
change and biodiversity loss. Human
activity is changing the world in myriad ways, and the deep time perspective
represented by our research can heighten awareness of the magnitude of human
ecological impact. Demonstrating that even humans without advanced technology
were able to cause a fundamental change in the long-lasting (300 million years)
co-occurrence structure of land plant and mammal communities is an important result
to communicate to the public, many of whom continue to express skepticism about
the effects of our current environmental impacts.
I wonder if 6000 years ago being the point of inflection might be the result of geographic representation. If the data set is mostly North American points, then we might expect the actual point where community composition shift to be at an earlier point in time. If the data set were mostly Eurasian for example we might see a change a couple thousand years earlier, which would coincide with their adoption of agriculture.
ReplyDelete