Paper 39
Sepkoski, J.J. 1988. Alpha,
beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go?
Paleobiology 14:221-234.
Blog by
Kaitlyn Sullivan
Paper Author: Jack Sepkoski
(Commentary by
Peter Wagner)
Jack Sepkoski Jr.
·
Professor of Paleontology at the University of Chicago
·
PhD from the Harvard University
·
Passed away in 1999
“During
the 1980s, using rigorous statistical analyses of the fossil record, Sepkoski
and his Chicago colleague David Raup put forth the controversial theory that
catastrophic extinctions of marine animals may have occurred approximately
every 26 million years during the past 250 million years of Earth's history.
These periodic events also included the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million
years ago. The extinctions previously were thought to have been random events.
The
theory helped open the possibility that mass extinctions both on land and in
the oceans were caused by some force external to Earth, such as catastrophic
comet and asteroid impacts of the type that inspired the films "Deep
Impact" and "Armageddon" and inspired the popular Shriekback
song "Nemesis." These findings prompted a major interdisciplinry
research effort on extinction events in the fossil record.”
Koppes, Steve. "Paleontologist J. John Sepkoski Jr.,
1948-1999." NASA. NASA, 4 May 1999. Web. 02 Apr. 2017.
Peter Wagner
·
Curator of Paleozoic Molluscs at the Smithsonian National
Museum of Natural History
·
Ph.D. Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago 1995, Thesis Title: "The generation and
maintenance of morphologic and phylogenetic diversity among early
gastropods."
·
M.S. Geological Sciences
Michigan State University 1990, Thesis Title: "Phylogenetic analysis
of the Lophospiridae (Gastropoda: Pleurotomariina) of the Ordovician and
Silurian."
·
B.S. Geological Sciences
Michigan State University 1989
·
B.S. Anthropology/Zoology
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1986
“The
fundamentals of my research revolve around phylogenetic relationships among
Paleozoic mollusks. The majority of my work has been on Cambrian - Devonian
anisostrophic gastropods, although I've started dabbling with bellerophont
gastropods also. I also have worked with a more obscure and entirely
extinct group, the Rostroconchia.
The
primary purpose of this phylogenetic work is to provide a template for the
macroevolutionary studies discussed below. However, it also has resulted in an
extensive taxonomic revision of Early Paleozoic gastropods.”
Wagner, Peter. "Department of
Paleobiology." Peter Wagner. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Apr. 2017.
Summary
In the commentary, Wagner states that
“this particular study directly examines how basic macroecological parameters
(environmental and biogeographic differentiation of faunas) affects basic
macroevolutionary parameters (i.e., global diversity and diversification over
time).” Wagner went on to distinguish
the difference between alpha-diversity, beta-diversity, and gamma-diversity. Alpha-diversity is defined as the “richness
within particular habitats”, beta-diversity is “differentiation among adjacent
environments and regions”, while gamma-diversity can be defined as “differentiation
among different faunal provinces”. Alpha
diversity measure the division of ecological resources among species. Beta diversity, is used to measure the
turnover rate of “species composition along environmental gradients”. Gamma diversity is similar to beta diversity,
however the spatial scales being measured are much larger and “reflects the
degree of provinciality or endemicity in the biota”.
As
stated in his abstract, Sepkoski objective was to investigate “how variation in
alpha and beta diversity influenced global diversity through the Paleozoic, and
especially during the Ordovician radiations”.
To investigate this, Sepkoski, used “a data set consisting of 505 faunal
lists distributed among 40 stratigraphic intervals and six environmental
zones”. Based on these data, finding
suggest the following:
1.
When measured at the genus level,
global taxonomic diversity increased by a factor of four during the Ordovician
radiation.
2.
Alpha diversity can account for a
small portion of this, exhibiting a 50 to 70 percent increase of species and
genus during the Ordovician
3.
Global diversity is also
influenced by beta diversity, increasing soft-bottom communities during the
Ordovician by approximately 50 percent at the generic level.
4.
Increase in beta diversity is
proportional to increasing habitat specialization of taxa as evolutionary fauna
during the Paleozoic replaced fauna from the Cambrian period.
5.
Any changes in global diversity
that cannot be attributed to changes in alpha or beta diversity is likely not
the result of gamma diversity during the Ordovician but likely due to “hidden”
forms of beta diversity, (i.e. “the appearance or expansion of new community
types”).
I didn't quite follow what he was talking about for "hidden" sources of beta diversity.
ReplyDeleteSo the rest of the global diversity that cannot be attributed to alpha and beta = hidden sources e.g. expansion of habitat types/community types? I'm not sure I follow - why would that not translate to alpha and beta diversity as well?
ReplyDelete